Why Measure Charity Overhead At 10%?

I accept that I may be an outlier on the debate that charity success should NOT be measured by a percentage of administrative overhead or specifically using the traditional 10% marker. So, let me share some of my thoughts why I think its prudent to have the 10/90 formula and perhaps it will stimulate further discussion amongst board, management and donors.

  1. Having management and governance volunteers draw a line at 10% can encourage robust and fruitful discussions about administrative effectiveness. The micro discussion surrounding variances to actual vs budget should lead to a deeper dive into how all spending is achieving the mission and social impact.
  2. Without nonprofit sector common classifications for accounting purposes, management can (and some often do) get creative on how they report expenses. Having a 10% mark can force the governance discussion on what and how expenses are reported. Charities should be reporting greater details about their admin expenses, identifying efficiencies (and deficiencies), while communicating the organization’s overall ROR and ROIs.
  3. The 10% boundary line can encourage management and staff to regularly, if not daily, evaluate their performance and commitment to donors. I believe there is nothing wrong with keeping donor generosity top of mind in everything we do.
  4. The idea “every dollar spent is a mission-driven spend” is a fallacy. Not all expenses are good expenses or can be attributed to meaningful, long-lasting social impact. I believe it is everyone’s responsibility inside the organization to be asking the tough questions about where and why they spend the donations and if, in fact, the level of social impact is achieved in line with the investment. The 10% fomula can serve as a deteriate for wasteful spending and promote better strategic and tactical investment.
  5. Holding onto a 10% administrative spending formula provides a jumping off point for educational discussions with current and potential donors, provides positive downward pressure to hold expenses without choking investment, and hopefully promotes a more transparent reporting exchange with donors that can help build credibility, trust and mutual respect.

Share this post with your network and/or reply with a comment below. Thank you!

Take a moment to Like Us on Facebook or subscribe thru our Email.


One thought on “Why Measure Charity Overhead At 10%?

Add yours

  1. Lots of good advice. Too many fundraisers forget where the money comes from that they spend, often much too freely. I was always aware of being careful and respectful of where the funds came from to provide us with our salaries and particularly items like travel and meal expenses. Like you say daily awareness of spending is important. BP

    Sent from my iPad



Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

Create a website or blog at WordPress.com

Up ↑

%d bloggers like this: